Keep the Ability to Do

Use the tools. Keep the skills.

Automation keeps getting better at almost everything. That is exactly why the people responsible for the outcome need to keep the skills to do the work themselves.

The fields that already learned this

The professions with the longest experience of automation reached the same conclusion: keep the manual skill, train it on purpose, and test it.

  • Airline pilots. In 2013 the FAA urged airlines to build hand flying into both line operations and training, after flight data showed an increase in manual handling errors. Later that year, an FAA rule revised airline pilot training to emphasize manual handling skills and stall and upset recovery. A 2017 FAA follow-up called for every training curriculum to include training and proficiency assessment in manual flight.
  • Surgeons. The American Board of Surgery requires general surgery candidates to pass the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery program, including a proctored hands-on skills exam, before they can be board certified. In urology, the American Urological Association's credentialing guidance says surgeons who operate robotically must also hold privileges for laparoscopic surgery.
  • Naval navigators. The Naval Academy stopped teaching celestial navigation in the late 1990s, trusting GPS. In 2015 it began teaching the skill again, starting with brief classroom lessons, because GPS can be jammed or hacked and ships had no backup. The Merchant Marine Academy never stopped teaching it.
  • Nuclear plant operators. NRC regulations require licensed reactor operators to stay in a continuing requalification program, including an annual operating test with simulator scenarios.
  • Power grid operators. NERC's training standard requires operators who control the most critical parts of the transmission system to train for emergency operations using simulation technology, so they rehearse running the grid when normal conditions fail.

None of these fields expects the professional to rebuild the automation. Pilots do not design autopilots. What they keep is the core skill of their role, plus the ability to recognize when the system is wrong and take over. That is the line worth holding.

For leaders

  • Name the core skills and protect them on purpose. Give people regular chances to do that work without the tool.
  • Test the bench. If the automation went down tomorrow, who could still build the schedule, run the estimate, or close the books? Find out before it matters.
  • Hold people accountable for understanding, not just output. "The system produced it" is not a review.
  • Use the tools. Refusing them is a choice to fall behind. The goal is people who use them well, not people who avoid them.

For doers

Your value is what you understand. Do the core of your work by hand often enough to know what right looks like, so you can tell when the tool is wrong.

For young people starting out

Build useful skills before you lean on the tools, and keep building them after. If all you can do is operate the button, you become the person who presses "yes" with no idea what is happening behind it, and that person is easy to replace. Learn the work first. Do it by hand until you understand it. Then let the tools make you faster. The people who will do best are the ones who can use AI and also explain why its answer is right.

The tools will keep getting better. That is the reason to keep getting better ourselves.

How this shows up in my own work: How I Use AI

The commitments I make to clients, including the choice between hand-built and AI-assisted work.